If you want to control the smoothness of the overall account, the position can be appropriately small, such as a medium position, and some funds can be reserved for better opportunities. In this way, you can attack and defend. You expect to go up, but you are not afraid of going down, because you are still a potential buyer, and you can do it more easily.If you buy everything, even if you don't buy a lot of shares, it will cost a lot of money together. The downside is that when the market plummeted, the funds you could have gradually increased your positions are now taken up and gone.Even if there is still some money, which one do you add in the face of so many positions? If you are really given a chance to increase your position by a big drop, you can't achieve the purpose of spreading the cost at all with what little money you have left. Don't say it doesn't make sense to reduce the cost of the whole account, even for the stock you added, it doesn't help much.
The logic of profiteering is less but better.Don't feel good when picking stocks. After buying a bunch of stocks, the position of each stock is just a scratch. Even if you see it right, you can't make a lot of money if it rises sharply.Don't feel good when picking stocks. After buying a bunch of stocks, the position of each stock is just a scratch. Even if you see it right, you can't make a lot of money if it rises sharply.
The logic of profiteering is less but better.If you are wrong, because your position is small and the loss of a single stock is relatively small, it is easy for you to cut your meat, because you don't feel bad, but if many stocks cut their meat like this, it will be a lot of money, and it will be a big loss.For this great goal, keep fighting.
Strategy guide
12-14
Strategy guide 12-14